<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to assign names to DIVs &#8211; CSS identifiers (Classes &amp; IDs)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kensfi.com/how-to-assign-names-to-divs-css-identifiers-classes-ids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kensfi.com/how-to-assign-names-to-divs-css-identifiers-classes-ids/</link>
	<description>Human crawler of the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.kensfi.com/how-to-assign-names-to-divs-css-identifiers-classes-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-44754</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kensfi.com/?p=1732#comment-44754</guid>
		<description>Having good names in your CSS is essential to good front-end coding practices just like well name variables. One comment I have is to not use names like &#039;bluebox&#039;, your CSS and HTML should be as separate as possible. I could see a project becoming very confusing if all the bluebox divs are actually green, the redbox divs blue and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having good names in your CSS is essential to good front-end coding practices just like well name variables. One comment I have is to not use names like &#8216;bluebox&#8217;, your CSS and HTML should be as separate as possible. I could see a project becoming very confusing if all the bluebox divs are actually green, the redbox divs blue and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: efusien</title>
		<link>http://www.kensfi.com/how-to-assign-names-to-divs-css-identifiers-classes-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-11452</link>
		<dc:creator>efusien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kensfi.com/?p=1732#comment-11452</guid>
		<description>The code is lighter, but less comprehensive by a human. I don&#039;t know if we improve significantly website loading with such short names.
Are browsers faster to treat HTML, CSS or JS with short names ? I don&#039;t think. If you find any suggestions about this subject I&#039;m interested in. Thank&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The code is lighter, but less comprehensive by a human. I don&#8217;t know if we improve significantly website loading with such short names.<br />
Are browsers faster to treat HTML, CSS or JS with short names ? I don&#8217;t think. If you find any suggestions about this subject I&#8217;m interested in. Thank&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.kensfi.com/how-to-assign-names-to-divs-css-identifiers-classes-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-11450</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kensfi.com/?p=1732#comment-11450</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Efusien, is just a matter of personal preferences the way you name DIVs. But, yes, there are a couple of names you will find pretty much in any style sheet like: #header, #content, #footer, #sidebar and maybe even more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve got a good point with the idea of simplifying the name like ct instead of content which indeed is making the code lighter. I wish there is a common way for developers in naming the DIVs but I don&#039;t think you will find one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Efusien, is just a matter of personal preferences the way you name DIVs. But, yes, there are a couple of names you will find pretty much in any style sheet like: #header, #content, #footer, #sidebar and maybe even more.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got a good point with the idea of simplifying the name like ct instead of content which indeed is making the code lighter. I wish there is a common way for developers in naming the DIVs but I don&#8217;t think you will find one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: efusien</title>
		<link>http://www.kensfi.com/how-to-assign-names-to-divs-css-identifiers-classes-ids/comment-page-1/#comment-11449</link>
		<dc:creator>efusien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kensfi.com/?p=1732#comment-11449</guid>
		<description>Hi, what about div&#039;s names shortcuts :
1) Can we improve performances by using &quot;ct&quot; instead of &quot;content&quot; ? Is there a limit to cut a name ? ie: At a first reading, I understand &quot;content&quot; but not &quot;ct&quot;. In other hand, with &quot;ct&quot; we have less html and css (file weight).
2) Have you list most popular div&#039;s names shorcuts ? If most of developpers uses same shorcuts, maybe it&#039;s a good practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, what about div&#8217;s names shortcuts :<br />
1) Can we improve performances by using &#8220;ct&#8221; instead of &#8220;content&#8221; ? Is there a limit to cut a name ? ie: At a first reading, I understand &#8220;content&#8221; but not &#8220;ct&#8221;. In other hand, with &#8220;ct&#8221; we have less html and css (file weight).<br />
2) Have you list most popular div&#8217;s names shorcuts ? If most of developpers uses same shorcuts, maybe it&#8217;s a good practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

